In SBS 2003 Premium (non-R2), SQL Server 2000 can only be installed on your
SBS machine for you to be covered by the SBS CALs. This in itself has
limitations like 4GB maximum memory and multiple instances running on the
SBS machine like SBSMONITORING and SHAREPOINT. By default, SQL Server (and
ISA if you install it as well) will use up as much memory resource as it can
unless you throttle it to suit your preference.
"JPD" wrote in message
> Hi Bob,
>
> This is a very open ended question. It really depends on what you intend
> to do with it. Can you give us an idea? Will you have large databases?
> Will you have lots of writes or reads or both to the databases? Will you
> have complex queries? Will you use replication? How many users are likely
> to connect at any one time? etc. etc. etc.
>
> To give you an indication, some people will get away with a few MBs of
> memory < 500MB on a system with just one CPU. Other may need GBs and GBs
> of memory, with a number of CPUs.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> My company currently has SBS 2003 Premium which comes with SQL server
>> 2000. We are considering installing SQL server for an optional server
>> component which is not essential, and therefore we would like to know
>> if SQL Server 2000 uses up a lot of system resources?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> >> Stay informed about: SQL Server Setup + System Resources