Data Access

External Since: Jul 01, 2008 Posts: 57

well gosh, how about

MICROSOFT
WEYERHAUSER
AMAZON
STARBUCKS

On Dec 26, 5:50 pm, "Gina Whipp" wrote:
> Please DO name the Companies...
>
> --
> Gina Whipp
>
> "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors
> II
> "a a r o n _ k e m p f" wrote in messagenews:df065cd7-ca5b-4140-b73d-920c2058fb4c@35g2000pry.googlegroups.com...
> sounds to me like you should learn SQL Server
>
> anyone using Jet in this day and age is just plain stupid.
>
> It has proven that it is incapable of reliable, high performance
> _SIMPLE_ database solutions for companies of any size.
>
> Any company that gives a hoot has moved out from Access-- I can name a
> handful of large companies in Seattle that have a strict _NO_JET_
> policy.
>
> -Aaron
>
> On Dec 26, 2:44 pm, "Gina Whipp" wrote:
>
>
>
> > Someone sounds like they didn't get they wanted for Christmas! There is
> > still hope for next year so perhaps you should start by acting like the
> > adult you calim to be!
>
> > --
> > Gina Whipp
>
> > "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors
> > II
> > "a a r o n _ k e m p f" wrote in
> > messagenews:b4d18df0-178a-4c98-b25e-c82db7ad6571@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> > you sit there and say you don't trash SQL Server-- but any time that
> > anyone talks about SQL Server, you push them away from it.
> > you sit there and say you don't trash SQL Server-- but any time that
> > anyone talks about SQL Server, you push them away from it.
> > you sit there and say you don't trash SQL Server-- but any time that
> > anyone talks about SQL Server, you push them away from it.
>
> > On Dec 24, 9:38 am, "BruceM" wrote:
>
> > > Wrong. I have never trashed SQL server, and I have acknowledged that SQL
> > > Server may be the better choice in some situations. However, Jet is also
> > > a
> > > good choice in some situations for somebody who understands the basics
> > > of
> > > database design.
>
> > > "a a r o n . k e m p f @ g m a i l . c o m"
> > > wrote
> > > in
> > > messagenews:2b87b0e4-8431-425f-a9c8-87662897d9da@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > BruceM has a history of trashing SQL Server and recommending Jet no
> > > matter the situation.
>
> > > Tony Toews has a history of trashing SQL Server and recommending Jet
> > > no
> > > matter the situation.
>
> > > On Dec 22, 4:23 am, "BruceM" wrote:
>
> > > > Raul,
>
> > > > A search of database threads will show you that the people other than
> > > > Aaron
> > > > who posted in this thread have a long history of providing helpful
> > > > advice,
> > > > while Aaron has a history of trashing Access and recommending SQL
> > > > server
> > > > no
> > > > matter the situation. Please note further that the others are
> > > > invariably
> > > > courteous. Aaron, of course, is not.
>
> > > > "a a r o n . k e m p f @ g m a i l . c o m"
> > > > wrote
> > > > in
> > > > messagenews:9ef05cf3-7c9e-493e-bfdd-60ea102c7f04@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> > > > WARNING!
>
> > > > TONY AND LARRY ARE KNOWN TROLLS AND ALWAYS RECCOMEND AN OBSOLETE
> > > > DATABASE (JET) EVEN WHEN THE REQUIREMENTS MEAN YOU SHOUDL BE USING SQL
> > > > SERVER.
>
> > > > Only someone who was too stupid to learn the 'worlds most popular
> > > > database (SQL Server)' would still be using Jet.
>
> > > > SQL Server is easier development than Jet.
>
> > > > -Aaron
>
> > > > On Dec 19, 2:08 pm, "Larry Linson" wrote:
>
> > > > > "Raul" wrote
>
> > > > > > I have an Application that accesses the data
> > > > > > relatively fast when the data sits on a local
> > > > > > computer BUT very slow when the data sits
> > > > > > on a network drive.
>
> > > > > Two excellent sources of information onperformanceand
> > > > > avoidingcorruption
> > > > > in multiuser environments are MVP Tony Toew's site
> > > > > athttp://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htmandformerMVPJeffConrad's
> > > > > site
> > > > > athttp://www.accessmvp.com/JConrad/accessjunkie.html.
>
> > > > > As has already been noted, additional information would help us to
> > > > > help
> > > > > you.
>
> > > > > Larry Linson
> > > > > Microsoft Office Access MVP- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

External Since: Oct 02, 2003 Posts: 28

As far as I KNOW they do not have a "strict _NO_JET_ policy". It has more
to do with their data handling/management.

--
Gina Whipp

"I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors
II

"a a r o n _ k e m p f" wrote in message

well gosh, how about

MICROSOFT
WEYERHAUSER
AMAZON
STARBUCKS

On Dec 26, 5:50 pm, "Gina Whipp" wrote:
> Please DO name the Companies...
>
> --
> Gina Whipp
>
> "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors
> II
> "a a r o n _ k e m p f" wrote in
> messagenews:df065cd7-ca5b-4140-b73d-920c2058fb4c@35g2000pry.googlegroups.com...
> sounds to me like you should learn SQL Server
>
> anyone using Jet in this day and age is just plain stupid.
>
> It has proven that it is incapable of reliable, high performance
> _SIMPLE_ database solutions for companies of any size.
>
> Any company that gives a hoot has moved out from Access-- I can name a
> handful of large companies in Seattle that have a strict _NO_JET_
> policy.
>
> -Aaron
>
> On Dec 26, 2:44 pm, "Gina Whipp" wrote:
>
>
>
> > Someone sounds like they didn't get they wanted for Christmas! There is
> > still hope for next year so perhaps you should start by acting like the
> > adult you calim to be!
>
> > --
> > Gina Whipp
>
> > "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" -
> > Tremors
> > II
> > "a a r o n _ k e m p f" wrote in
> > messagenews:b4d18df0-178a-4c98-b25e-c82db7ad6571@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> > you sit there and say you don't trash SQL Server-- but any time that
> > anyone talks about SQL Server, you push them away from it.
> > you sit there and say you don't trash SQL Server-- but any time that
> > anyone talks about SQL Server, you push them away from it.
> > you sit there and say you don't trash SQL Server-- but any time that
> > anyone talks about SQL Server, you push them away from it.
>
> > On Dec 24, 9:38 am, "BruceM" wrote:
>
> > > Wrong. I have never trashed SQL server, and I have acknowledged that
> > > SQL
> > > Server may be the better choice in some situations. However, Jet is
> > > also
> > > a
> > > good choice in some situations for somebody who understands the basics
> > > of
> > > database design.
>
> > > "a a r o n . k e m p f @ g m a i l . c o m"
> > > wrote
> > > in
> > > messagenews:2b87b0e4-8431-425f-a9c8-87662897d9da@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > BruceM has a history of trashing SQL Server and recommending Jet no
> > > matter the situation.
>
> > > Tony Toews has a history of trashing SQL Server and recommending Jet
> > > no
> > > matter the situation.
>
> > > On Dec 22, 4:23 am, "BruceM" wrote:
>
> > > > Raul,
>
> > > > A search of database threads will show you that the people other
> > > > than
> > > > Aaron
> > > > who posted in this thread have a long history of providing helpful
> > > > advice,
> > > > while Aaron has a history of trashing Access and recommending SQL
> > > > server
> > > > no
> > > > matter the situation. Please note further that the others are
> > > > invariably
> > > > courteous. Aaron, of course, is not.
>
> > > > "a a r o n . k e m p f @ g m a i l . c o m"
> > > > wrote
> > > > in
> > > > messagenews:9ef05cf3-7c9e-493e-bfdd-60ea102c7f04@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> > > > WARNING!
>
> > > > TONY AND LARRY ARE KNOWN TROLLS AND ALWAYS RECCOMEND AN OBSOLETE
> > > > DATABASE (JET) EVEN WHEN THE REQUIREMENTS MEAN YOU SHOUDL BE USING
> > > > SQL
> > > > SERVER.
>
> > > > Only someone who was too stupid to learn the 'worlds most popular
> > > > database (SQL Server)' would still be using Jet.
>
> > > > SQL Server is easier development than Jet.
>
> > > > -Aaron
>
> > > > On Dec 19, 2:08 pm, "Larry Linson" wrote:
>
> > > > > "Raul" wrote
>
> > > > > > I have an Application that accesses the data
> > > > > > relatively fast when the data sits on a local
> > > > > > computer BUT very slow when the data sits
> > > > > > on a network drive.
>
> > > > > Two excellent sources of information onperformanceand
> > > > > avoidingcorruption
> > > > > in multiuser environments are MVP Tony Toew's site
> > > > > athttp://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htmandformerMVPJeffConrad's
> > > > > site
> > > > > athttp://www.accessmvp.com/JConrad/accessjunkie.html.
>
> > > > > As has already been noted, additional information would help us to
> > > > > help
> > > > > you.
>
> > > > > Larry Linson
> > > > > Microsoft Office Access MVP- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -